The Role of Customer Reviews in Generation

[Shishirgano9]

China was a pioneer in regulating deepfakes, in Europe we are trying to adapt the AI ​​Act to the technological disruption of generative AI. In the meantime, each platform is tackling these issues in its own way. Among them is the Red Team at OpenAI and the ARC, an independent body tasked with assessing worst-case scenarios involving the GPT model. Tech companies that release AI tools are working to build in safeguards to prevent abuse, but they can’t control open-source versions . At least one powerful AI language tool, created by Facebook’s parent company Meta, has already been leaked online and quickly posted on the anonymous message board 4chan.



Midjourney’s content restrictions are more permissive than panama phone number library some rival services (such as OpenAI’s DALL-E), but more severe than others (e.g., Stable Diffusion). Midjourney does implement a priori moderation and maintains a list of banned terms (such as Xi Jinping) “ related to topics in various countries, based on user complaints from those nations ,” according to a post by David Holz from October 2022. However, it does not disclose the full list to avoid “ quarrels .” As Holz noted, “ Almost no one ever sees [the banned list] unless they are deliberately trying to provoke a conflict, which is against our rules in the TOS [Terms of Service] .



” However, this does not prevent the use of synonyms or circumlocutions to evade filters. Social networks, which already failed in detecting the old generation of fake news before the arrival of generative AI, are also trying to play a warning role (by leaving the verification work to users): In the meantime, the demiurges of generative AI are creating the virus while offering the antidote : OpenAI has released a free tool designed to help educators and others determine whether a particular piece of text was written by a human or a machine. AI literacy and media literacy with a healthy dose of critique seem more than important.