Can you guess why they did not work?

[sumaiyakhatun26]

80–85% of new pages with such semantics successfully flew into the index and even got into the top 3 of Google and Yandex. For the sake of experiment, I decided to select 50 keywords of a new type: "best brands of cottage cheese", "the most delicious sausage", "which yogurt is the best", etc. None of the 50 new pages made it into the top 10 in 2 months.


It seems that the queries are not commercial and not very frequent. list of canada whatsapp phone numbers Answer: queries have a combined intent, not just informational. And it is much more difficult to get into the top for phrases with commercial intent than for informational ones. Myth 4. You only need to work with high-frequency phrases This is a misconception. Businesses that want to promote only by high-frequency phrases are losing money.


You will not move domains that have been sitting in a niche for many years. It is much more effective for a “young” site to promote itself by medium- and low-frequency semantics - this way you will definitely get some traffic. Keywords with high search demand (high-frequency) are very competitive, so ranking by them is extremely difficult, even for very high-quality and old sites. Therefore, it is much easier for a new site to rank by low-frequency semantics Besides, low-frequency keywords still make up a significant part of the overall search traffic in RuNet.