” The full version of the report explains what companies unfortunately

[sumonasumonakha.t]

Didn’t do to protect LGBTQIAP+ users and gives key recommendations for them to change this. As part of Meta company, Instagram and Facebook averaged around 48 and 46, respectively. Some of the main reasons are that both Meta’s platforms have no policy protecting users from targeted deadnaming and misgendering. Another point in the report is that “Meta also discloses only limited information regarding the options users have to control the company’s collection and inference of user information related to their sexual orientation and gender identity.


” Meanwhile, Twitter, object of desire and at the same time of refusal of Elon Musk, scored 45% out buy russia telegram database of 100%. Some points that pulled the score down for the bluebird platform were the fact that it doesn’t have a tool for gender pronouns on profiles and also, according to report, the content moderators don’t have training about the needs of LGBTQ users and other vulnerable groups. Youtube has scored 45% and the main reasons being that they repeat the mistakes of their platform colleagues: no option for gender pronouns, no training for moderator of contents and no policy protecting users from targeted deadnaming and misgendering.


TikTok, the darling of Gen Z, also left something to be desired with a score of 43%. They were the only company that did not disclose any information about steps to have a more diverse workforce. Why are these numbers so bad for society and LGBTQIAP+ community? I know it’s easy to think stuff like “oh, social media needs to act for the safety of all users”. And I agree, of course; at the same time this doesn’t mean that we don’t have to take a look at specific groups.