Web3 puts the power back into the hands of creators

[shaownhasane]

Direct monetization and ownership: Traditional Web2 platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok offer limited and opaque monetization models for most creators. Revenue sharing for commercial breaks is the norm. Platforms maintain tight control over their share of ad revenue, leaving creators unsure whether they are being paid fairly.

. Creators can independently monetize by gaining cambodia business email list direct support from fans through NFT sales or tokens. Blockchain technology makes ownership of creative IP and content provable. For creators who prefer sustainability over dependency, Web3 may offer them an attractive career alternative.

Community Governance: A centralized platform controls all policies and updates, often without input from creators. In Web3, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) enable creators and core community members to have a say in governance decisions. For example, Rug Radio uses a DAO structure where NFT holders vote on budgets and plans. This mechanism combines incentives between creators and supporters.

Censorship Resistance: Web2 platforms often suspend accounts or remove content deemed unacceptable, causing creators to lose their livelihoods. Content on a decentralized blockchain is permanent and not controlled by the platform. While content moderation remains critical, Web3 may reduce the centralized censorship and harassment that creators currently face.

Movable Audiences: Siled Web2 platforms limit creators from fully owning and moving audiences. In Web3, content tied to NFTs and tokens can interoperate across applications rather than being trapped in closed gardens. Creators can gain more autonomy in distribution and monetization.

Access funding: Web3 opens up new models for creators to raise funds directly from backers, whether through NFT drops, token sales, or decentralized lending. This frees creators from relying on brand sponsorships and platform monetization.